Some controversy stirred up earlier this week after the Electronic Frontier  Foundation stepped in on behalf of the creators of Wikipediaart.org, a site dedicated to a  Wikipedia-related art project. The EFF was responding to demands by a lawyer for  the Wikimedia Foundation, the parent company of Wikipedia, that the artists turn  over control of the domain.
Claims that the domain violated Wikimedia's  trademark and the ensuing legal back and forth have renewed the debate over fair  use and free speech, and to an extent, what constitutes art. There's even a bit  of a debate over what constitutes "a threat."
Wikipedia founder Jimmy  Wales characterizes the project as "an alleged bit of performance art," and the  project creators, Scott Kildall and Nathaniel Stern, as "trolls" "dedicated to  vandalizing Wikipedia as a publicity stunt." [His full statement is available as  an update to an earlier article, linked below.]
The project originally  took place on the Wikipedia site itself, but was quickly deleted by Wikipedia  editors. Though there was some debate over whether a collaborative art project  had a place in an online encyclopedia, the final agreement was that the  project—also thought to be critical of Wikipedia itself—was a form of vandalism.  
read More >>>

No comments:
Post a Comment